Polling for Connecticut
Lieberman - 68%
Lamont - 13%
Unsure/Other - 19%
Chris Bowers goes off his usual cliff in deducing that these numbers mean that Ned Lamont is "right where we want to be" ... 55 points down with six months to go!
Of course, he does so by comparing polling for a Presidential race to ... well ... nothing really. Apparently one race makes for a trendline here.
I'm just really curious what the party line of the far left will be after Joe wins the nomination. Perhaps ... just perhaps ... it'll be as riddled with misconceptions and "facts" as the explanations for Dean's downfall in early 2004.
Categories
Politics-20066 Comments
Categories
News Links
Search
Recent Posts
- Winning by the Book
- Backtrack
- E-day Results of Interest
- E-Day 2007
- Irregular PSA to Debunk the Myth of a Liberal Media: Colorado Edition
- Other Assorted Predictions ...
- Two for HISD Bonds ...
- Angst @ 40
- Goofing Off At 39
- McCain Declares Victory!
- Sullivan on the Ropes
- Begala on Obama
- Imagine if They Filmed the Coaches' Signals
- Further Reading on Kirkpatrick
- A Little Good News
- The Most Important Thing To Read This Week
Recent Comments
fugitive on Polling for Connecticut: Interesting opinion, Greg. Hopelessly obtuse, clueless, and, um, wrong as well; interesting nonethel
Chris on Polling for Connecticut: Crash and burn, Greg. CRASH AND BURN!!!!! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Dissento on Polling for Connecticut: So, Greg. I guess we'll never have to hear "the party line of the far left will be after Joe wins t
Greg Wythe on Polling for Connecticut: Actually, it's a riff on the words used (IIRC) by Jerome Armstrong back when he & KOS did their Prim
P.M.Bryant on Polling for Connecticut: I couldn't find where Bowers suggested this was "right where we need to be". I did, however, see th
Dustin R. Ridgeway on Polling for Connecticut: I think the left blogosphere also sees it's power in bringing races they have a stake in and care ab
Chris on Polling for Connecticut: Crash and burn, Greg. CRASH AND BURN!!!!! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Dissento on Polling for Connecticut: So, Greg. I guess we'll never have to hear "the party line of the far left will be after Joe wins t
Greg Wythe on Polling for Connecticut: Actually, it's a riff on the words used (IIRC) by Jerome Armstrong back when he & KOS did their Prim
P.M.Bryant on Polling for Connecticut: I couldn't find where Bowers suggested this was "right where we need to be". I did, however, see th
Dustin R. Ridgeway on Polling for Connecticut: I think the left blogosphere also sees it's power in bringing races they have a stake in and care ab
Pages
Tag Cloud
- 10blogs
- 2007 Elections
- 2008 Presidential Campaign
- 2008 Senate Campaign
- 2008 Texas Senate Campaign
- Abortion
- Alberto Gonzales
- Amazon
- Amy Sullivan
- Andrew Sullivan
- Barack Obama
- Beauchamp
- Bill Belichek
- Bill Clinton
- C.O. Bradford
- Campaign Finance Reform
- Carrie Underwood
- Case Keenum
- Charlie Wilson
- Charlie Wilson's War
- CHIPs
- Chris Bell
- Christianity
- Chuck Rosenthal
- David Brooks
- Democrats
- dlc
- Escalation
- Faith
- Football
- Foreign Policy
- Fred Thompson
- Google Maps
- Greg Boyd
- Harris County
- Harris County Republicans
- hateHouston
- HD137
- Health Care
- Heavy Metal
- Hillary Clinton
- HISD
- Hispanics
- Houston Chronicle
- Houston City Council
- Houston Crime
- Immigration
- Iraq
- Jared Woodfill
- Jean Schmidt
- Joel Hunter
- Joel Osteen
- John Edwards
- John McCain
- Journalism
- Kay Bailey Hutchison
- Kristen Mack
- Kyle Janek
- Larry Craig
- Mayor White
- Media Bias
- Melissa Noriega
- Mikal Watts
- Mike Stafford
- Mississippi
- Mitt Romney
- NASA
- National Blogosphere
- New Republic
- NFL
- Niki Tsongas
- Petraeus
- Port of Houston
- Republican Scandals
- Republicans
- Rick Casey
- Rick Noriega
- Rick Richards
- Rick Santorum
- Ron Paul
- Roy Morales
- Sam Nunn
- Samantha Power
- Scott Hochberg
- SEIU Lovell
- Sharon Keller. Court of Criminal Appeals
- Slaughter
- Sunflower County
- Sylvester Turner
- Texas
- Texas Blogosphere
- The Donnas
- Third Way
- Tiffany
- Trinity Trojans
- University of Houston
- weird
Powered by Movable Type Publishing Platform
I think the left blogosphere also sees it's power in bringing races they have a stake in and care about, to the attention of the less aware inclined to vote Democratic. They popularize them to people who may not follow the daily political sccop as closely. And since they really want Ned Lamont to win and really want Joe Lieberman to lose they utilize a duel strategy; The first part is to relentlessly highlight anything that has to do with Lieberman and spin it in the worst light possible to him, almost to a comical extent. The other half is to relentlessly highlight any and everything to do with Ned Lamont and Name drop him so much you'd think they get 25 cents for every mention of him. Most times this requires creating something fully out of nothing; "I spoke with Ned Lamont today, boy is he awesome!" "I was just thinking about Ned Lamont, what a great guy!"
Chris Bowers and Matt Stoller, Markos & Atrios are n't THAT obtuse. They're smart guys, they know what they're doing. And to even keep the dim flame of hope that is defeating Lieberman alive, they have to willfully play FOX News games to their readership.
I couldn't find where Bowers suggested this was "right where we need to be". I did, however, see the words: "These may not be the numbers we wanted at first, but it certainly isn't hopeless."
Actually, it's a riff on the words used (IIRC) by Jerome Armstrong back when he & KOS did their Primary Polls of Dem Presidentials. Everytime Dean kept coming up in the single digits, Dean was "right were we want to be" because the move from 4% to 7% was seen as "proof" that things were clicking.
By that same token, the readings of Lamont's polling numbers generate much the same sentiment, even if not the same exact words. In fact, there's another poll out that shows Joe as an independent winning the election outright ... yet it's offered as "proof" of Lamont's strength.
Just par for the course with those guys ... so I may have to dust off a few of the gems they came up with to describe the inevitability of Howard Dean as President (and now, Lamont as Senator).
So, Greg. I guess we'll never have to hear "the party line of the far left will be after Joe wins the nomination," eh?
Would you like some wine with your big honkin' plate of crow?
Crash and burn, Greg. CRASH AND BURN!!!!!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Interesting opinion, Greg. Hopelessly obtuse, clueless, and, um, wrong as well; interesting nonetheless.
And funny as hell in retrospect! I suggest fried crow with fava beans.